Collusive attacks to ``circle-type multi-party quantum key agreement protocols
From MaRDI portal
Publication:296141
DOI10.1007/S11128-016-1264-5zbMATH Open1338.81169arXiv1602.00393OpenAlexW2283493637MaRDI QIDQ296141FDOQ296141
Di Xiao, Run-Zong Liu, Heng-Yue Jia, Bin Liu
Publication date: 14 June 2016
Published in: Quantum Information Processing (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We find that existing multi-party quantum key agreement (MQKA) protocols designed for fairness of the key are, in fact, unfair. Our analysis shows that these protocols are sensitive to collusive attacks; that is, dishonest participants can collaborate to predetermine the key without being detected. In fact, the transmission structures of the quantum particles in those unfair MQKA protocols, three of which have already been analyzed, have much in common. We call these unfair MQKA protocols circle-type MQKA protocols. Likewise, the transmission structures of the quantum particles in MQKA protocols that can resist collusive attacks are also similar. We call such protocols complete-graph-type MQKA protocols. A MQKA protocol also exists that can resist the above attacks but is still not fair, and we call it the tree-type MQKA protocol. We first point out a common, easily missed loophole that severely compromises the fairness of present circle-type MQKA protocols. Then we show that two dishonest participants at special positions can totally predetermine the key generated by circle-type MQKA protocols. We anticipate that our observations will contribute to secure and fair MQKA protocols, especially circle-type protocols.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.00393
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing
- Multi-party quantum key agreement with Bell states and Bell measurements
- Improvements on ``multiparty quantum key agreement with single particles
- Quantum key agreement with EPR pairs and single-particle measurements
- Efficient multi-party quantum key agreement by cluster states
- Secure quantum private comparison
- Multiparty quantum key agreement with single particles
- Three-party quantum key agreement with two-photon entanglement
- Quantum key agreement against collective decoherence
- Two-party quantum key agreement with four-qubit cluster states
- Novel multiparty quantum key agreement protocol with GHZ states
- Protocols of quantum key agreement solely using Bell states and Bell measurement
- Quantum secret sharing
- Quantum cryptography
- Improvement on ``quantum key agreement protocol with maximally entangled states
- Efficient quantum private comparison employing single photons and collective detection
- Cryptanalysis of a multi-party quantum key agreement protocol with single particles
- Multi-party quantum key agreement by an entangled six-qubit state
- Controlling the key by choosing the detection bits in quantum cryptographic protocols
- Quantum key agreement protocols with four-qubit cluster states
- Improving the security of protocols of quantum key agreement solely using Bell states and Bell measurement
Cited In (34)
- Improvement of ``Novel multiparty quantum key agreement protocol with GHZ states
- Novel multi-party quantum key agreement protocol with G-like states and Bell states
- Comment on “Quantum key agreement protocol”
- Improving the security of quantum key agreement protocols with single photon in both polarization and spatial-mode degrees of freedom
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Efficient multiparty quantum key agreement using block-based single particles
- Multi-party quantum key agreement protocol with authentication
- New semi-quantum key agreement protocol based on the \(\chi\)-type entanglement states
- Multi-party quantum summation without a third party based on \(d\)-dimensional Bell states
- Multiparty quantum key agreement protocol based on locally indistinguishable orthogonal product states
- High-efficiency three-party quantum key agreement protocol with quantum dense coding and Bell states
- Multi-party quantum summation with a single d-level quantum system
- Multi-party quantum key agreement protocol based on G-like states and \(\chi^+\) states
- Multiparty quantum key agreement with four-qubit symmetric W state
- Improvements on: ``Multi-party quantum key agreement protocol with Bell states and single particles
- Multiparty quantum key agreement based on Grover’s algorithm and its implementation
- Multi-party quantum key agreement without entanglement
- An efficient circle-type multiparty quantum key agreement protocol with single particles
- Cryptanalysis of multi-party quantum key agreement with five-qubit Brown states
- Multi-party quantum key agreement protocol for smart home environment
- Advancing multi-party quantum key agreement protocols: the power of a two-layer approach
- Multi-party traveling-mode quantum key agreement protocols immune to collusive attack
- Dynamic quantum session key agreement protocol based on \(d\)-level mutually unbiased bases
- Multiparty quantum key agreement protocol with entanglement swapping
- Multi-party quantum key agreement protocol for detection of collusive attacks in each sub-circle segment by headers
- Secure multi-party quantum summation based on quantum Fourier transform
- Two-party quantum key agreement with five-particle entangled states
- A tree-type multiparty quantum key agreement protocol against collusive attacks
- Multi-party quantum key agreement with four-qubit cluster states Immune to collusive attack
- Two-layer multiparty quantum key agreement protocol with collective detection
- Efficient single-state multi-party quantum key agreement
- Multi-party quantum key agreement with four-qubit cluster states
- Dynamic multi-party quantum key agreement protocol based on commutative encryption
- Multi-party quantum key agreement protocol secure against collusion attacks
This page was built for publication: Collusive attacks to ``circle-type multi-party quantum key agreement protocols
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q296141)