Inferential justification and the transparency of belief

DOI10.1111/NOUS.12088MaRDI QIDQ2965385zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors David James Barnett

Publication date 3 March 2017

Published in Nôus (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://philarchive.org/rec/BARIJA-2

zbMATH Keywords

transparencyevidenceinferenceMoore's paradoxintrospection

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Recommendations

• Transparency and the KK principle
• Why transparency undermines economy
• A defense of temperate epistemic transparency
• Is justification easy or impossible? Getting acquainted with a middle road
• Inference and epistemic transparency

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2229035 (Why is no real title available?)
• Multiple studies and evidential defeat

Cited in

(7)

• Justification by acquaintance
• Epistemic instrumentalism and the reason to believe in accord with the evidence
• Self-intimation, infallibility, and higher-order evidence
• The two faces of compatibility with justified beliefs
• Is justification easy or impossible? Getting acquainted with a middle road
• Why transparency undermines economy
• A defense of temperate epistemic transparency

This page was built for publication: Inferential justification and the transparency of belief

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2965385)