Group Testing Algorithms: Bounds and Simulations

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2986358

DOI10.1109/TIT.2014.2314472zbMATH Open1360.68970arXiv1306.6438OpenAlexW2158419847WikidataQ60522086 ScholiaQ60522086MaRDI QIDQ2986358FDOQ2986358


Authors: Matthew Aldridge, Leonardo Baldassini, Oliver Johnson Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 16 May 2017

Published in: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We consider the problem of non-adaptive noiseless group testing of N items of which K are defective. We describe four detection algorithms: the COMP algorithm of Chan et al.; two new algorithms, DD and SCOMP, which require stronger evidence to declare an item defective; and an essentially optimal but computationally difficult algorithm called SSS. By considering the asymptotic rate of these algorithms with Bernoulli designs we see that DD outperforms COMP, that DD is essentially optimal in regimes where KgeqsqrtN, and that no algorithm with a nonadaptive Bernoulli design can perform as well as the best non-random adaptive designs when K>N0.35. In simulations, we see that DD and SCOMP far outperform COMP, with SCOMP very close to the optimal SSS, especially in cases with larger K.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6438







Cited In (17)





This page was built for publication: Group Testing Algorithms: Bounds and Simulations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2986358)