Teaching the computer how to discover(!) and then prove(!!) (all by itself(!!!)) analogues of Collatz's notorious 3x + 1 conjecture
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2997148
Abstract: Paul Erdos claimed that mathematics is not yet ready to settle the 3x+1 conjecture. I agree, but very soon it will be! With the exponential growth of computer-generated mathematics, we (or rather our silicon brethrern) would have a shot at it. Of course, not by number crunching, but by symbol crunching and automatic deduction. In the present article, I taught my computer how to use the brilliant ideas of four human beings (Amal Amleh, Ed Grove, Candy Kent, and Gerry Ladas) to prove two-dimensional analogs of this notorious conjecture. Once programmed (using my Maple package LADAS) it reproduced their ten theorems, and generated 134 new ones, complete with proofs. All by itself! I believe that the proof of the original 3x+1 conjecture would be in the same vein, but one would need a couple of extra human ideas, and better computers.
Recommendations
- About the Collatz conjecture
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3957204
- The Collatz problem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3910471
- The ultimate challenge. The \(3x+1\) problem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4162966
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5885061
- On Unsettleable Arithmetical Problems
- Some natural generalizations of the Collatz problem
Cites work
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Teaching the computer how to discover(!) and then prove(!!) (all by itself(!!!)) analogues of Collatz's notorious 3x + 1 conjecture
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2997148)