scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2186968
This book is the author's dissertation. It consists of a thorough analysis of theories formalizing finitely iterated inductive definitions. In the first chapter the theories are defined in several variations and their proof-theoretic strength is determined. These results (together with some completions of chapter 2.2) are published separately [\textit{K. Aehlig}, J. Symb. Log. 70, No. 4, 1087--1107 (2005)]. In chapter 2 induction on the natural numbers is added. It is shown that ``[o]n the one hand, adding full induction results in an increase of the proof-theoretical strength by an additional inductive definition. On the other hand induction on arithmetical formulae only affects the arithmetical consequences of the system. [p.~31] The third chapter contains a discussion of fragments of system F which characterize the provably recursive function of the theories under considerations. In the final section the limit of the theories, \(\text{ID}^c_{<\omega}\), is considered which can be characterized as the one-variable fragment of intuitionistic analysis.
- Weak determinacy and iterations of inductive definitions
- Induction and inductive definitions in fragments of second order arithmetic
- Proof-theoretic strengths of weak theories for positive inductive definitions
- Recursion theory on weak fragments of Peano arithmetic: A study of definable cuts
- A finite axiomatisation of inductive-inductive definitions
- An interpretation of intuitionistic analysis with restricted transfinite inductive definitions
- A Proof-Theoretic Analysis of Theories for Stratified Inductive Definitions
- Finiteness axioms on fragments of intuitionistic set theory
- Forcing and reductibilities. II. Forcing in fragments of analysis
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 515737
- The metamathematics of ergodic theory
- Systems of explicit mathematics with non-constructive \(\mu\)-operator. I
- A note on the theory of positive induction, \({{\text{ID}}^*_1}\)
- Fragment of Nonstandard Analysis with a Finitary Consistency Proof
- Iterated inductive definitions revisited
- Schwichtenberg's style analysis of parameter-free fragments of Girard's system F
This page was built for publication:
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3025192)