On the equivalence of linear sets

From MaRDI portal
Publication:306339

DOI10.1007/S10623-015-0141-ZzbMATH Open1352.51003arXiv1501.03441OpenAlexW1895078076MaRDI QIDQ306339FDOQ306339

Bence Csajbók, Corrado Zanella

Publication date: 31 August 2016

Published in: Designs, Codes and Cryptography (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Let L be a linear set of pseudoregulus type in a line ell in Sigma*=mathrmPG(t1,qt), t=5 or t>6. We provide examples of q-order canonical subgeometries Sigma1,,Sigma2subsetSigma* such that there is a (t3)-space GammasubsetSigma*setminus(Sigma1cupSigma2cupell) with the property that for i=1,2, L is the projection of Sigmai from center Gamma and there exists no collineation phi of Sigma* such that Gammaphi=Gamma and Sigma1phi=Sigma2. Condition (ii) given in Theorem 3 in Lavrauw and Van de Voorde (Des. Codes Cryptogr. 56:89-104, 2010) states the existence of a collineation between the projecting configurations (each of them consisting of a center and a subgeometry), which give rise by means of projections to two linear sets. It follows from our examples that this condition is not necessary for the equivalence of two linear sets as stated there. We characterize the linear sets for which the condition above is actually necessary.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03441




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (32)





This page was built for publication: On the equivalence of linear sets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q306339)