Runner-up patents: is monopoly inevitable?

DOI10.1111/J.1467-9442.2010.01603.XzbMATH Open1202.91083OpenAlexW2139402525MaRDI QIDQ3065337FDOQ3065337

Emeric Henry

Publication date: 5 January 2011

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8gjo2i2i

zbMATH Keywords

patentsdeadweight lossoptimal mix of instrumentssecond inventor

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Macroeconomic theory (monetary models, models of taxation) (91B64) Welfare economics (91B15)

Cites Work

• Market Structure and Innovation
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (1)

• Dynamic competition and intellectual property rights in a model of product development

   Recommendations

• OPTIMAL RULES FOR PATENT RACES* 👍 👎
• On the social desirability of patents for sequential innovations in a vertically differentiated market 👍 👎
• Prizes and patents: using market signals to provide incentives for innovations 👍 👎
• On the diffusion of competing innovations 👍 👎
• Patent Rights and Innovation Disclosure 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Runner-up patents: is monopoly inevitable?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3065337)