Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests

DOI10.1111/1541-0420.00019zbMATH Open1210.62175OpenAlexW2132965523WikidataQ47894478 ScholiaQ47894478MaRDI QIDQ3079093FDOQ3079093

Authors: Andrzej S. Kosinski, Huiman X. Barnhart 

Publication date: 1 March 2011

Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0420.00019

Recommendations

• Estimators of sensitivity and specificity in the presence of verification bias: A Bayesian ap\-proach
• Verification bias on sensitivity and specificity measurements in diagnostic medicine: a comparison of some approaches used for correction
• A robust method using propensity score stratification for correcting verification bias for binary tests
• The Effect of Verification Bias in the Naïve Estimators of Accuracy of a Binary Diagnostic Test
• Nonparametric analysis for the ROC areas of two diagnostic tests in the presence of nonignorable verification bias.

zbMATH Keywords

diagnostic testnonignorable missing dataverification bias

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical applications (general) (92C50) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Adjusting for Nonignorable Drop-Out Using Semiparametric Nonresponse Models
• Identification in Parametric Models
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Semiparametric Regression for Repeated Outcomes with Nonignorable Nonresponse
• Pattern-Mixture Models for Multivariate Incomplete Data
• Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models
• Missing Covariates in Generalized Linear Models When the Missing Data Mechanism is Non-ignorable
• Reparameterizing the Pattern Mixture Model for Sensitivity Analyses Under Informative Dropout
• Methods for conducting sensitivity analysis of trials with potentially nonignorable competing causes of censoring
• Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias
• Sensitivity Analysis for Incomplete Contingency Tables: The Slovenian Plebiscite Case
• Evaluating Multiple Diagnostic Tests with Partial Verification

Cited In (26)

• Inferences on the Outfluence – How do Missing Values Impact Your Analysis?
• The effect of verification bias on the comparison of predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests
• Imputation Approaches for Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy for Multiple Tests from Partially Verified Designs
• Nonparametric analysis for the ROC areas of two diagnostic tests in the presence of nonignorable verification bias.
• Comparing diagnostic tests with missing data
• Optimal Bayesian Design for Patient Selection in a Clinical Study
• Verification bias -- impact and methods for correction when assessing accuracy of diagnostic tests
• Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias
• Robust estimation of area under ROC curve using auxiliary variables in the presence of missing biomarker values
• Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard
• Evaluation of incomplete multiple diagnostic tests, with an application in the colon cancer family registry study
• Correcting for partial verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies: a tutorial using R
• A robust method using propensity score stratification for correcting verification bias for binary tests
• Verification bias on sensitivity and specificity measurements in diagnostic medicine: a comparison of some approaches used for correction
• Estimators of sensitivity and specificity in the presence of verification bias: A Bayesian ap\-proach
• A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach
• On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation
• The Effect of Verification Bias in the Naïve Estimators of Accuracy of a Binary Diagnostic Test
• Bayesian analysis of the performance of two diagnostic tests when negative individuals on both tests are not verified by a gold standard
• Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of disease
• Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
• Determining sample size to evaluate and compare the accuracy of binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial disease verification
• Comparison of the accuracy of multiple binary tests in the presence of partial disease verification
• OR practice-data analytics for optimal detection of metastatic prostate cancer
• Empirical likelihood confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous-scale diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
• Estimation of the disease-specific diagnostic marker distribution under verification bias

This page was built for publication: Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3079093)