Reassurance for the logic of paradox

DOI10.1017/S1755020311000207zbMATH Open1252.03009MaRDI QIDQ3096824FDOQ3096824

Authors: Marcel Crabbé 

Publication date: 14 November 2011

Published in: The Review of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Recommendations

• Logic of paradox revisited
• On Priest's logic of paradox
• Why Priest's reassurance is not reassuring
• Paraconsistent logic and model theory
• Automated correspondence analysis for the binary extensions of the logic of paradox

zbMATH Keywords

logic of paradoxclassical recapturereassurance relative to a less inconsistent relation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• Minimally abnormal models in some adaptive logics

Cited In (9)

• Expressive limitations of naïve set theory in LP and minimally inconsistent LP.
• DLEAC and the rejection paradox
• Some Comments and Replies
• Reassurance via translation
• Why Priest's reassurance is not reassuring
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On the methodology of paraconsistent logic
• Disarming a paradox of validity
• On non-transitive ``identity

This page was built for publication: Reassurance for the logic of paradox

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3096824)