Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations in the presence of misclassification
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3145579
Recommendations
- Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations under double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers
- Partially identified prevalence estimation under misclassification using the kappa coefficient
- Estimating disease prevalence in two-phase studies
- Confidence interval construction for disease prevalence based on partial validation series
- Bayesian Sample Size Determination for Prevalence and Diagnostic Test Studies in the Absence of a Gold Standard Test
Cites work
- Confidence interval construction for disease prevalence based on partial validation series
- Inference using surrogate outcome data and a validation sample
- Misclassification in 2 X 2 Tables
- Tests of Statistical Hypotheses Concerning Several Parameters When the Number of Observations is Large
- The Prevalence of Malaria in Garki, Nigeria: Double Sampling with a Fallible Expert
Cited in
(5)- Testing for empty sets when misclassifications may be present
- Partially identified prevalence estimation under misclassification using the kappa coefficient
- Optimal classification and generalized prevalence estimates for diagnostic settings with more than two classes
- Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations under double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers
- Using the Standardized Difference to Compare the Prevalence of a Binary Variable Between Two Groups in Observational Research
This page was built for publication: Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations in the presence of misclassification
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3145579)