Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness

DOI10.2178/jsl/1190150111zbMath1010.03043arXivmath/0102086OpenAlexW2000919584MaRDI QIDQ3149996

Arthur W. Apter, Joel David Hamkins

Publication date: 29 September 2002

Published in: Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0102086

zbMATH Keywords

strongly compact cardinalindestructibilitysupercompact cardinalLaver indestructiblelevel-by-level agreement

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Consistency and independence results (03E35) Large cardinals (03E55)

Related Items (15)

Exactly controlling the non-supercompact strongly compact cardinals ⋮ Failures of SCH and level by level equivalence ⋮ Supercompactness and level by level equivalence are compatible with indestructibility for strong compactness ⋮ HOD-supercompactness, Indestructibility, and Level by Level Equivalence ⋮ An \(L\)-like model containing very large cardinals ⋮ Indestructibility, HOD, and the Ground Axiom ⋮ Indestructibility and measurable cardinals with few and many measures ⋮ Indestructibility, instances of strong compactness, and level by level inequivalence ⋮ Indestructible Strong Compactness and Level by Level Equivalence with No Large Cardinal Restrictions ⋮ Indestructibility and destructible measurable cardinals ⋮ Indestructibility and stationary reflection ⋮ Indestructibility under adding Cohen subsets and level by level equivalence ⋮ Indestructibility, measurability, and degrees of supercompactness ⋮ The failure of GCH at a degree of supercompactness ⋮ A universal indestructibility theorem compatible with level by level equivalence

Cites Work

• On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal
• Making the supercompactness of \(\nu\) indestructible under \(\nu\)-directed closed forcing
• Destruction or preservation as you like it
• Cabal Seminar 79-81. Proceedings, Caltech-UCLA Logic Seminar 1979-81
• Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis
• The lottery preparation
• Strong compactness, measurability, and the class of supercompact cardinals
• Precipitous ideals
• How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or a study on identity crises
• On the strong equality between supercompactness and strong compactness
• Identity crises and strong compactness. II: Strong cardinals
• Gap forcing

This page was built for publication: Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness