Is backreaction really small within concordance cosmology?

DOI10.1088/0264-9381/28/16/164010MaRDI QIDQ3173067zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors C. Clarkson, Obinna Umeh

Publication date 10 October 2011

Published in Classical and Quantum Gravity (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1886

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Exact solutions to problems in general relativity and gravitational theory (83C15) Approximation procedures, weak fields in general relativity and gravitational theory (83C25) Macroscopic interaction of the gravitational field with matter (hydrodynamics, etc.) (83C55) Relativistic cosmology (83F05)

Abstract: Smoothing over structures in general relativity leads to a renormalisation of the background, and potentially many other effects which are poorly understood. Observables such as the distance-redshift relation when averaged on the sky do not necessarily yield the same smooth model which arises when performing spatial averages. These issues are thought to be of technical interest only in the standard model of cosmology, giving only tiny corrections. However, when we try to calculate observable quantities such as the all-sky average of the distance-redshift relation, we find that perturbation theory delivers divergent answers in the UV and corrections to the background of order unity. There are further problems. Second-order perturbations are the same size as first-order, and fourth-order at least the same as second, and possibly much larger, owing to the divergences. Much hinges on a coincidental balance of 2 numbers: the primordial power, and the ratio between the comoving Hubble scales at matter-radiation equality and today. Consequently, it is far from obvious that backreaction is irrelevant even in the concordance model, however natural it intuitively seems.

Recommendations

• Backreaction: directions of progress
• Multiple-scales approach to the averaging problem in cosmology
• Backreaction Effects on the Luminosity-Redshift Relation in Inhomogeneous Cosmology
• Is there proof that backreaction of inhomogeneities is irrelevant in cosmology?
• A simple, heuristic derivation of our `no backreaction' results

Cited in

(14)

• Is there proof that backreaction of inhomogeneities is irrelevant in cosmology?
• Multiple-scales approach to the averaging problem in cosmology
• The averaging problem on the past null cone in inhomogeneous dust cosmologies
• Higher order relativistic galaxy number counts: dominating terms
• The Fitting Problem in a Lattice Universe
• A simple, heuristic derivation of our `no backreaction' results
• Inhomogeneity-induced variance of cosmological parameters
• Towards statistically homogeneous and isotropic perfect fluid universes with cosmic backreaction
• On the convergence of cosmographic expansions in Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi models
• Vorticity generation in cosmology and the role of shell crossing
• Testing the equivalence principle on cosmological scales using the odd multipoles of galaxy cross-power spectrum and bispectrum
• Backreaction in cosmic screening approach
• Backreaction: directions of progress
• Addendum to: ``Islands in multiverse models

This page was built for publication: Is backreaction really small within concordance cosmology?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3173067)