V = L and intuitive plausibility in set theory. A case study

DOI10.2178/BSL/1309952317zbMATH Open1258.03070OpenAlexW2094261094MaRDI QIDQ3174637FDOQ3174637

Tatiana Arrigoni

Publication date: 11 October 2011

Published in: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1309952317

Recommendations

• A MULTIVERSE PERSPECTIVE ON THE AXIOM OF CONSTRUCTIBILITY
• What is meant by \(V\)? Reflections on the universe of all sets
• On the naturalness of new axioms in set theory
• Some naturalistic reflections on set theoretic method
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1092439

zbMATH Keywords

philosophy of mathematicsaxiom of constructibilityintuitiveness in set theorysuccess in mathematics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Inner models, including constructibility, ordinal definability, and core models (03E45)

Cites Work

• The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy
• Descriptive set theory
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Fine Structure
• Beginning Inner Model Theory
• An Outline of Inner Model Theory
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• What is meant by \(V\)? Reflections on the universe of all sets
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• What is Cantor's Continuum Problem?
• Objectivity over objects: A case study in theory formation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Does V equal L?

Cited In (2)

• Foundational implications of the inner model hypothesis
• Against naturalized cognitive propositions

This page was built for publication: \(V = L\) and intuitive plausibility in set theory. A case study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3174637)