Sharpening some classical numerical radius inequalities

DOI10.7153/OAM-2018-12-26zbMATH Open1487.47013arXiv1708.02345OpenAlexW2962846525WikidataQ129712820 ScholiaQ129712820MaRDI QIDQ3174838FDOQ3174838

Authors: Mohsen Erfanian Omidvar, Hamid Reza Moradi, Khalid Shebrawi 

Publication date: 18 July 2018

Published in: Operators and Matrices (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: New upper and lower bounds for the numerical radii of Hilbert space operators are given. Among our results, we prove that if $AinmathcalBleft(mathcalHight)$ is a hyponormal operator, then for all non-negative non-decreasing operator convex $f$ on $[0,infty),$ we have [fleft( omega left( A ight) ight)le frac{1}{2}left| fleft( frac{1}{1+frac{xi_{left| A ight|}^{2}}{8}}left| A ight| ight)+fleft( frac{1}{1+frac{xi_{left| A ight|}^{2}}{8}}left| {{A}^{*}} ight| ight) ight|,] where ${xi}_{left|Aight|}=undersetleft|xight|=1mathopinf,leftfracleftlangleleft(left|Aight|-left|A^{ast}ight|ight)x,xightangleleftlangleleft(left|Aight|+left|A^{ast}ight|ight)x,xightangleight$. Our results refine and generalize earlier inequalities for hyponormal operator.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02345

Recommendations

• Further inequalities for the numerical radius of Hilbert space operators
• Better bounds on the numerical radii of Hilbert space operators
• Numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators. II
• Refining the upper bound for the numerical radius of Hilbert space operators
• Numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators

zbMATH Keywords

operator normhyponormal operatornumerical radiusAM-GM inequality

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Norms (inequalities, more than one norm, etc.) of linear operators (47A30) Numerical range, numerical radius (47A12) Subnormal operators, hyponormal operators, etc. (47B20)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Numerical radius and operator norm inequalities
• Numerical Radius Inequalities for Commutators of Hilbert Space Operators
• On upper and lower bounds of the numerical radius and an equality condition
• A numerical radius inequality and an estimate for the numerical radius of the Frobenius companion matrix
• Numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators
• Numerical radius inequalities for certain \(2 \times 2\) operator matrices
• Simultaneous extensions of Selberg inequality and Heinz-Kato-Furuta inequality
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Norm inequalities for certain operator sums
• Upper and lower bounds for the numerical radius with an application to involution operators
• Improved arithmetic-geometric mean inequality and its application
• Numerical radius inequalities for certain \(2\times 2\) operator matrices. II
• Operator Jensen inequality for superquadratic functions

Cited In (18)

• More accurate numerical radius inequalities (II)
• New estimates on numerical radius and operator norm of Hilbert space operators
• Some refinements of numerical radius inequalities for 2 × 2 operator matrices
• Some improvements about numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators
• New Berezin symbol inequalities for operators on the reproducing kernel Hilbert space
• New estimates for the numerical radius of Hilbert space operators
• Improved inequalities for numerical radius via Cartesian decomposition
• Some new numerical radius and Hilbert-Schmidt numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators
• Some norm and operator inequalities to improved AM-GM inequality with Specht’s ratio
• Sharpening interval computations
• Better bounds on the numerical radii of Hilbert space operators
• Refinements of numerical radius inequalities using the Kantorovich ratio
• Improved inequalities for the numerical radius
• An alternative estimate for the numerical radius of Hilbert space operators
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• New estimates for the Berezin number of Hilbert space operators
• More accurate numerical radius inequalities (I)
• A convex treatment of numerical radius inequalities

This page was built for publication: Sharpening some classical numerical radius inequalities

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3174838)