Bayesian analysis of ODEs: solver optimal accuracy and Bayes factors

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3179310

DOI10.1137/140976777zbMATH Open1352.65193arXiv1311.2281OpenAlexW310515683MaRDI QIDQ3179310FDOQ3179310


Authors: Marcos A. Capistrán, J. A. Christen, Sophie Donnet Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 21 December 2016

Published in: SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In most relevant cases in the Bayesian analysis of ODE inverse problems, a numerical solver needs to be used. Therefore, we cannot work with the exact theoretical posterior distribution but only with an approximate posterior deriving from the error in the numerical solver. To compare a numerical and the theoretical posterior distributions we propose to use Bayes Factors (BF), considering both of them as models for the data at hand. We prove that the theoretical vs a numerical posterior BF tends to 1, in the same order (of the step size used) as the numerical forward map solver does. For higher order solvers (eg. Runge-Kutta) the Bayes Factor is already nearly 1 for step sizes that would take far less computational effort. Considerable CPU time may be saved by using coarser solvers that nevertheless produce practically error free posteriors. Two examples are presented where nearly 90% CPU time is saved while all inference results are identical to using a solver with a much finer time step.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.2281




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (11)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Bayesian analysis of ODEs: solver optimal accuracy and Bayes factors

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3179310)