A comparative test on the enumeration of extensions in abstract argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3187009
DOI10.3233/FI-2015-1254zbMATH Open1348.68237OpenAlexW2126731257MaRDI QIDQ3187009FDOQ3187009
Stefano Bistarelli, Fabio Rossi, Francesco Santini
Publication date: 15 August 2016
Published in: Fundamenta Informaticae (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/fi-2015-1254
Recommendations
- Enumerating extensions on random abstract-AFs with ArgTools, ASPARTIX, ConArg2, and Dung-O-Matic
- On the computation of Top-\(k\) extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Not only size, but also shape counts: abstract argumentation solvers are benchmark-sensitive
- On the maximal and average numbers of stable extensions
- Algorithms for argumentation semantics: labeling attacks as a generalization of labeling arguments
Cited In (7)
- Analyzing the Equivalence Zoo in Abstract Argumentation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Design and results of the second international competition on computational models of argumentation
- Lattice point of view for argumentation framework
- New stochastic local search approaches for computing preferred extensions of abstract argumentation
- A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation
- The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
This page was built for publication: A comparative test on the enumeration of extensions in abstract argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3187009)