Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: The Adequacy of the Control Group as a Measure of Confounding
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3201512
DOI10.2307/2531530zbMATH Open0715.62219OpenAlexW2321661576WikidataQ68532520 ScholiaQ68532520MaRDI QIDQ3201512FDOQ3201512
Authors: Priya J. Wickramaratne, Theodore R. Holford 
Publication date: 1987
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2531530
Recommendations
- The foundations of confounding in epidemiology
- Criteria for Confounders in Epidemiological Studies
- Case-control studies: Assessing the effect of a confounding factor
- Standardization and control for confounding in observational studies: a historical perspective
- Confounding, homogeneity and collapsibility for causal effects in epidemiologic studies.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2134550
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Epidemiology (92D30)
Cited In (10)
- Standardization and control for confounding in observational studies: a historical perspective
- On quantifying the magnitude of confounding
- Some results about standardization for a non confounder in estimators of (log) relative risk
- The foundations of confounding in epidemiology
- Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference
- Criteria for Confounders in Epidemiological Studies
- Making apples from oranges: Comparing noncollapsible effect estimators and their standard errors after adjustment for different covariate sets
- Conditions for uniformly non-confounding of causal distribution effects over multiple covariates
- Confounding, homogeneity and collapsibility for causal effects in epidemiologic studies.
- Detecting multiple confounders
This page was built for publication: Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: The Adequacy of the Control Group as a Measure of Confounding
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3201512)
