Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3224231

DOI10.1093/biomet/asr064zbMath1234.62145OpenAlexW2089695595WikidataQ36142989 ScholiaQ36142989MaRDI QIDQ3224231

Aiyi Liu, Chunling Liu, Paul S. Albert, Zhiwei Zhang

Publication date: 29 March 2012

Published in: Biometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asr064




Related Items

Estimating proportions by group retesting with unequal group sizes at each stagegroupTesting: an R package for group testing estimationNonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group‐tested results with differential misclassificationArray-based schemes for group screening with test errors which incorporate a concentration effectRobust group testing for multiple traits with misclassificationSequential estimation in the group testing problemOn the construction of unbiased estimators for the group testing problemTwo‐Stage Hierarchical Group Testing for Multiple Infections with Application to the Infertility Prevention ProjectGroup testing regression model estimation when case identification is a goalDetermination of varying group sizes for pooling procedureOptimal group testing designs for prevalence estimation combining imperfect and gold standard assaysA New Estimator for a Population Proportion Using Group TestingThe optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassificationPooled testing for quarantine decisionsRegression models for group testing: identifiability and asymptoticsEfficient methods for the estimation of the multinomial parameter for the two-trait group testing modelBias correction in estimating proportions by imperfect pooled testingOptimizing pooled testing for estimating the prevalence of multiple diseasesRobust procedures for experimental design in group testing considering misclassificationRevisiting Nested Group Testing Procedures: New Results, Comparisons, and Robustness