The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification
DOI10.1080/03610926.2014.923461zbMATH Open1397.62478OpenAlexW2414544982MaRDI QIDQ2816441FDOQ2816441
Authors: Wenjun Xiong 
Publication date: 22 August 2016
Published in: Communications in Statistics. Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2014.923461
Recommendations
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
- Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Use of Binomial Group Testing in Tests of Hypotheses for Classification or Quantitative Covariables
- Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing
measurement errormisclassificationgroup testingFisher informationnegative binomial distributioninverse samplinggroup size
Statistical aspects of information-theoretic topics (62B10) Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)
Cites Work
- On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
- Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
- Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Estimating ordered binomial proportions with the use of group testing
- Informative Dorfman screening
- Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2816441)
