Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5234444
Recommendations
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Bias correction in estimating proportions by pooled testing
- Bias correction in estimating proportions by imperfect pooled testing
- The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification
- Estimating ordered binomial proportions with the use of group testing
- An alternative Bayesian estimator of small proportion using binomial group testing
- Estimation of proportions by group testing with retesting of positive groups
- Revisiting retesting in the estimation of proportions by group testing
Cites work
- A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions
- Bias correction in estimating proportions by pooled testing
- Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates
- Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
- Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
- Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
- Group Testing for Sensitive Characteristics: Extension to Higher Prevalence Levels
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Random walk designs for selecting pool sizes in group testing estimation with small samples
- Screening
- Sequential estimation in the group testing problem
- Sequentially Deciding between Two Experiments for Estimating a Common Success Probability
- The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification
Cited in
(10)- Bias correction in estimating proportions by pooled testing
- Efficient methods for the estimation of the multinomial parameter for the two-trait group testing model
- A new estimator for a population proportion using group testing
- The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification
- Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
- Sequential estimation in the group testing problem
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Estimation of log-odds ratio from group testing data using Firth correction
- Clustered and unclustered group testing for biosecurity
- Hypergeometric and binomial group sampling with an imperfect test
This page was built for publication: Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5234444)
