Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing

DOI10.1007/s13253-010-0036-4zbMath1306.62324OpenAlexW2005578321WikidataQ35090545 ScholiaQ35090545MaRDI QIDQ2260204

Joshua M. Tebbs, Nicholas A. Pritchard

Publication date: 5 March 2015

Published in: Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3131210

zbMATH Keywords

prevalencemaximum likelihoodnegative binomial distributiongroup testinggeometric distributionWest Nile virusfoot and mouth disease

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics (62P12)

Related Items (12)

Estimation of proportions by group testing with retesting of positive groups ⋮ Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing ⋮ Sequential estimation in the group testing problem ⋮ Proportional closeness estimation of probability of contamination under group testing ⋮ A New Estimator for a Population Proportion Using Group Testing ⋮ Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing ⋮ The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification ⋮ Odds ratio-based group sequential analysis for joint binomial and inverse binomial sampling ⋮ Interval Estimations for the Mean of the Generalized Poisson and Generalized Negative Binomial Distributions ⋮ Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing ⋮ Group testing: Revisiting the ideas ⋮ Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing

Cites Work

• Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing
• Large-sample hypothesis tests for stratified group-testing data
• Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
• On Latent-Variable Model Misspecification in Structural Measurement Error Models for Binary Response
• Assessing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: Observed versus expected Fisher information
• Bayesian Models for Limiting Dilution Assay and Group Test Data
• Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
• Mid-P confidence intervals based on the likelihood ratio for proportions estimated by group testing
• Regression Models for Disease Prevalence with Diagnostic Tests on Pools of Serum Samples
• On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
• ON A METHOD OF ESTIMATING FREQUENCIES
• Group Testing Regression Models with Fixed and Random Effects

This page was built for publication: Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing