Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:872086)
Recommendations
- Hypothesis Tests for and against a Simple Order among Proportions Estimated by Pooled Testing
- On testing equality of two independent proportions: to pool or not to pool
- Tests for equivalence based on proportion ratio in categorical paired-sample data
- Exact Tests for Comparing Two Paired Proportions with Incomplete Data
- Comparison of correlated proportions based on paired binary data from clustered samples
- Paired-Samples Tests of Equivalence
- Statistical theory for the ratio model of paired comparisons
- Pairwise multiple comparisons. Theory and computation
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 50804 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
- A One-Sided Studentized Range Test for Testing Against a Simple Ordered Alternative
- A Path Length Inequality for the Multivariate-t Distribution, With Applications to Multiple Comparisons
- A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions
- Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for the Difference between Two Binomial Parameters for Use with Small Samples
- Estimating ordered binomial proportions with the use of group testing
- Multiple Comparisons
- On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
- Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions
- Screening for the Presence of a Disease by Pooling Sera Samples
- Simple and Effective Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Differences of Proportions Result from Adding Two Successes and Two Failures
- Use of Binomial Group Testing in Tests of Hypotheses for Classification or Quantitative Covariables
Cited in
(22)- Estimation of binomial proportions from pooled samples using an objective prior
- Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
- Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
- Determination of varying group sizes for pooling procedure
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5117151 (Why is no real title available?)
- Classic group testing with cost for grouping and testing
- Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing
- Exact Tests for Comparing Two Paired Proportions with Incomplete Data
- Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
- Regression Models for Disease Prevalence with Diagnostic Tests on Pools of Serum Samples
- Optimality of group testing with differential misclassification
- Properties of a one-sided likelihood ratio test as applied to pool screening
- Large-sample hypothesis tests for stratified group-testing data
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 817577 (Why is no real title available?)
- Multiple testing of composite null hypotheses for discrete data using randomized \(p\)-values
- Incorporating retesting outcomes for estimation of disease prevalence
- Dual estimation of prevalence and disease incidence in pool-testing strategy
- Simultaneous Logit-Based Confidence Intervals for Odds Ratios in 2 × kClassification Tables with a Fixed Reference Level
- Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group‐tested results with differential misclassification
- Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Comparing Binomial Parameters
- Analysis of Multistage Pooling Studies of Biological Specimens for Estimating Disease Incidence and Prevalence
- Hypothesis Tests for and against a Simple Order among Proportions Estimated by Pooled Testing
This page was built for publication: Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q872086)
