Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing
DOI10.1016/J.JSPI.2006.02.007zbMATH Open1107.62056OpenAlexW2067219636MaRDI QIDQ872086FDOQ872086
Joshua M. Tebbs, Melinda H. McCann
Publication date: 27 March 2007
Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2006.02.007
Recommendations
- Hypothesis Tests for and against a Simple Order among Proportions Estimated by Pooled Testing
- On testing equality of two independent proportions: to pool or not to pool
- Tests for equivalence based on proportion ratio in categorical paired-sample data
- Exact Tests for Comparing Two Paired Proportions with Incomplete Data
- Comparison of correlated proportions based on paired binary data from clustered samples
- Paired-Samples Tests of Equivalence
- Statistical theory for the ratio model of paired comparisons
- Pairwise multiple comparisons. Theory and computation
multiple comparisonssimultaneous inferencegroup testingscreening experimentsHIV seroprevalence estimationJeffreys--Perks intervalsvector-transfer design
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)
Cites Work
- Simple and Effective Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Differences of Proportions Result from Adding Two Successes and Two Failures
- A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
- Multiple Comparisons
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Screening for the Presence of a Disease by Pooling Sera Samples
- On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening
- A One-Sided Studentized Range Test for Testing Against a Simple Ordered Alternative
- Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for the Difference between Two Binomial Parameters for Use with Small Samples
- A Path Length Inequality for the Multivariate-t Distribution, With Applications to Multiple Comparisons
- A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions
- Estimating ordered binomial proportions with the use of group testing
- Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions
- Use of Binomial Group Testing in Tests of Hypotheses for Classification or Quantitative Covariables
Cited In (17)
- Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
- Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Classic group testing with cost for grouping and testing
- Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing
- Exact Tests for Comparing Two Paired Proportions with Incomplete Data
- Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
- Regression Models for Disease Prevalence with Diagnostic Tests on Pools of Serum Samples
- Large-sample hypothesis tests for stratified group-testing data
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Multiple testing of composite null hypotheses for discrete data using randomized \(p\)-values
- Incorporating retesting outcomes for estimation of disease prevalence
- Simultaneous Logit-Based Confidence Intervals for Odds Ratios in 2 × kClassification Tables with a Fixed Reference Level
- Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group‐tested results with differential misclassification
- Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Comparing Binomial Parameters
- Hypothesis Tests for and against a Simple Order among Proportions Estimated by Pooled Testing
- Analysis of Multistage Pooling Studies of Biological Specimens for Estimating Disease Incidence and Prevalence
This page was built for publication: Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q872086)
