Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing

DOI10.1002/BIMJ.201000148zbMath1207.62065OpenAlexW1976798034WikidataQ35058196 ScholiaQ35058196MaRDI QIDQ3084180

Joshua M. Tebbs, Nicholas A. Pritchard

Publication date: 15 March 2011

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3119490

zbMATH Keywords

maximum likelihoodBayesian estimationWest Nile virusinverse samplingpooled testing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Bayesian inference (62F15) Testing in survival analysis and censored data (62N03)

Related Items (5)

Jeffreys prior for negative binomial and zero inflated negative binomial distributions ⋮ Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing ⋮ Sequential estimation in the group testing problem ⋮ The optimal group size using inverse binomial group testing considering misclassification ⋮ Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing

Cites Work

• Pairwise comparisons for proportions estimated by pooled testing
• Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
• Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
• Bayesian inference for prevalence and diagnostic test accuracy based on dual-pooled screening
• A Two-Stage Adaptive Group-Testing Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions
• Screening with Cost-Effective Quality Control: Potential Applications to HIV and Drug Testing
• Bayesian Models for Limiting Dilution Assay and Group Test Data
• Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
• Mid-P confidence intervals based on the likelihood ratio for proportions estimated by group testing
• Informative Retesting

This page was built for publication: Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing