Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4335789
Cited in
(20)- Estimating proportions by group retesting with unequal group sizes at each stage
- Estimation of the Proportion of Defective Units by Using Group Testing Under the Existence of a Threshold of Detection
- Large-sample hypothesis tests for stratified group-testing data
- Evaluation of a frequentist hierarchical model to estimate prevalence when sampling from a large geographic area using pool screening
- Confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions estimated from pooled samples
- Estimating disease prevalence using inverse binomial pooled testing
- Robust procedures for experimental design in group testing considering misclassification
- Bias correction in estimating proportions by pooled testing
- Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group‐tested results with differential misclassification
- A new estimator for a population proportion using group testing
- Properties of a one-sided likelihood ratio test as applied to pool screening
- Improved exact confidence intervals for a proportion using ranked-set sampling
- Sequential estimation in the group testing problem
- Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing
- Particle count estimation in dilution series experiments
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Pool Screening: An Example of Independent Nonidentical Bernoulli Trial
- Confidence interval procedures for proportions estimated by group testing with groups of unequal size adjusted for overdispersion
- Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Estimation of proportions by group testing with retesting of positive groups
This page was built for publication: Exact Confidence Intervals for Proportions Estimated by Group Testing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4335789)
