Oceanic Games: Centralization Risks and Incentives in Blockchain Mining
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3294792
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-37110-4_13zbMath1457.91427arXiv1904.02368OpenAlexW2934929315MaRDI QIDQ3294792
Georgios Piliouras, Stefanos Leonardos, Nikos Leonardos
Publication date: 29 June 2020
Published in: Mathematical Research for Blockchain Economy (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.02368
Related Items (4)
Ignore the extra zeroes: variance-optimal mining pools ⋮ \textsf{HaPPY-Mine}: designing a mining reward function ⋮ Market Equilibria and Risk Diversification in Blockchain Mining Economies ⋮ Griefing Factors and Evolutionary In-Stabilities in Blockchain Mining Games
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Thunderella: blockchains with optimistic instant confirmation
- But why does it work? A rational protocol design treatment of bitcoin
- The Bitcoin backbone protocol with chains of variable difficulty
- Ouroboros: a provably secure proof-of-stake blockchain protocol
- Bootstrapping the blockchain, with applications to consensus and fast PKI setup
- The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications
- Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable
- Values of Large Games II: Oceanic Games
- Values of Large Games, I: A Limit Theorem
- Socially Optimal Mining Pools
- Oligopoly in Markets with a Continuum of Traders
- Multiplicative updates outperform generic no-regret learning in congestion games
- Markets with a Continuum of Traders
This page was built for publication: Oceanic Games: Centralization Risks and Incentives in Blockchain Mining