Decision sciences and the new case for paternalism: three welfare-related justificatory challenges

DOI10.1007/S00355-016-0972-1zbMATH Open1392.91019OpenAlexW2462109555MaRDI QIDQ331728FDOQ331728

Authors: Roberto Fumagalli 

Publication date: 27 October 2016

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/decision-sciences-and-the-new-case-for-paternalism(afe352fc-3f0d-42ba-b052-741571ec23d1).html

Recommendations

• Psychology implies paternalism? Bounded rationality may reduce the rationale to regulate risk-taking
• If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers' stance on paternalism
• Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles
• Informed desire and the ambitions of libertarian paternalism
• John Stuart Mill, soft paternalist

zbMATH Keywords

decision sciencesnew case for paternalism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Cites Work

• (A,f): Choice with Frames¹
• Eliciting welfare preferences from behavioural data sets
• The value of opportunities over time when preferences are unstable
• Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment
• Informed desire and the ambitions of libertarian paternalism

Cited In (4)

• If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers' stance on paternalism
• Paternalism with hindsight: do protégés react consequentialistically to paternalism?
• Informed desire and the ambitions of libertarian paternalism
• John Stuart Mill, soft paternalist

This page was built for publication: Decision sciences and the new case for paternalism: three welfare-related justificatory challenges

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q331728)