Recognizing when heuristics can approximate minimum vertex covers is complete for parallel access to NP
DOI10.1051/ita:2005041zbMath1085.68056arXivcs/0110025OpenAlexW2569714044MaRDI QIDQ3374757
Jörg Rothe, Holger Spakowski, Edith Hemaspaandra
Publication date: 22 February 2006
Published in: RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0110025
Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20) Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17) Complexity classes (hierarchies, relations among complexity classes, etc.) (68Q15)
Related Items (3)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- It is hard to know when greedy is good for finding independent sets
- Recognizing when greed can approximate maximum independent sets is complete for parallel access to NP
- The strong exponential hierarchy collapses
- The complexity of Kemeny elections
- \(P^{NP[O(\log n)}\) and sparse turing-complete sets for NP]
- The complexity of optimization problems
- More complicated questions about maxima and minima, and some closures of NP
- Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems
- On the ratio of optimal integral and fractional covers
- Exact complexity of the winner problem for Young elections
- Complexity of the exact domatic number problem and of the exact conveyor flow shop problem
- A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover
- Bounded Query Classes
- The difference and truth-table hierarchies for NP
- A Greedy Heuristic for the Set-Covering Problem
- Exact analysis of Dodgson elections
- On the hardness of approximating minimization problems
- The Minimization Problem for Boolean Formulas
This page was built for publication: Recognizing when heuristics can approximate minimum vertex covers is complete for parallel access to NP