Is there a good epistemological argument against platonism?

DOI10.1111/J.1467-8284.2006.00601.XzbMath1111.03307OpenAlexW2136762740MaRDI QIDQ3417356

David Liggins

Publication date: 29 January 2007

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00601.x

zbMATH Keywords

Platonismnominalismexistence of mathematical objects

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (3)

On Field's epistemological argument against Platonism ⋮ Optimus prime: paraphrasing prime number talk ⋮ Benacerraf, Field, and the agreement of mathematicians

This page was built for publication: Is there a good epistemological argument against platonism?