On Field's epistemological argument against Platonism

DOI10.1007/S11225-010-9278-YzbMATH Open1208.03016OpenAlexW2013241351MaRDI QIDQ603897FDOQ603897

Authors: Ivan Kasa 

Publication date: 8 November 2010

Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9278-y

Recommendations

• The reality of Field's epistemological challenge to Platonism
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1254479
• Existential claims and Platonism
• The Conceivability of Platonism
• Epistemology versus non-causal realism

zbMATH Keywords

mathematical nominalismBenacerrafepistemological challenges to PlatonismField

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Is there a good epistemological argument against platonism?

Cited In (3)

• The reality of Field's epistemological challenge to Platonism
• Existential claims and Platonism
• Benacerraf, Field, and the agreement of mathematicians

This page was built for publication: On Field's epistemological argument against Platonism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q603897)