On Field's epistemological argument against Platonism

DOI10.1007/S11225-010-9278-YMaRDI QIDQ603897zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Ivan Kasa

Publication date 8 November 2010

Published in Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9278-y

zbMATH Keywords

mathematical nominalismBenacerrafepistemological challenges to PlatonismField

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Recommendations

• The reality of Field's epistemological challenge to Platonism
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1254479
• Existential claims and Platonism
• The Conceivability of Platonism
• Epistemology versus non-causal realism

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 51351 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 957946 (Why is no real title available?)
• Is there a good epistemological argument against platonism?

Cited in

(3)

• The reality of Field's epistemological challenge to Platonism
• Existential claims and Platonism
• Benacerraf, Field, and the agreement of mathematicians

This page was built for publication: On Field's epistemological argument against Platonism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q603897)