Epistemology versus non-causal realism

DOI10.1007/S11229-015-1010-ZzbMATH Open1382.03035OpenAlexW2288160302MaRDI QIDQ1708792FDOQ1708792

Authors: Jared Warren 

Publication date: 27 March 2018

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-1010-z

Recommendations

• The epistemology of nondeterminism
• The epistemology of nondeterminism
• Verificationists versus realists: The battle over knowability
• Epistemology
• Epistemology without knowledge and without belief

zbMATH Keywords

epistemologyrealismepistemological arguments against realismreliability challenge

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Cites Work

• Counterfactuals.
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Radical interpretation
• Doubt truth to be a liar
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A Platonist epistemology.
• Conventionalism, consistency, and consistency sentences
• What is absolute undecidability?
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (5)

• Realism, reliability, and epistemic possibility: on modally interpreting the Benacerraf-Field challenge
• Counterpossibles for modal normativists
• On Field's epistemological argument against Platonism
• Does the Interventionist Notion of Causation Deliver Us from the Fear of Epiphenomenalism?
• A metasemantic challenge for mathematical determinacy

This page was built for publication: Epistemology versus non-causal realism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1708792)