Epistemology versus non-causal realism

DOI10.1007/S11229-015-1010-ZMaRDI QIDQ1708792zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Jared Warren

Publication date 27 March 2018

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-1010-z

zbMATH Keywords

epistemologyrealismepistemological arguments against realismreliability challenge

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Recommendations

• The epistemology of nondeterminism
• The epistemology of nondeterminism
• Verificationists versus realists: The battle over knowability
• Epistemology
• Epistemology without knowledge and without belief

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 51351 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1250161 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2152226 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 957946 (Why is no real title available?)
• A Platonist epistemology.
• Conventionalism, consistency, and consistency sentences
• Counterfactuals.
• Doubt truth to be a liar
• Radical interpretation
• What is absolute undecidability?

Cited in

(5)

• Realism, reliability, and epistemic possibility: on modally interpreting the Benacerraf-Field challenge
• Counterpossibles for modal normativists
• On Field's epistemological argument against Platonism
• A metasemantic challenge for mathematical determinacy
• Does the Interventionist Notion of Causation Deliver Us from the Fear of Epiphenomenalism?

This page was built for publication: Epistemology versus non-causal realism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1708792)