How far do EPR-Bell experiments constrain physical collapse theories?

DOI10.1088/1751-8113/40/12/S15MaRDI QIDQ3431663zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors A. J. Leggett

Publication date 12 April 2007

Published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/12/s15

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantum computation (81P68) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15)

Recommendations

• Bell's inequalities and EPR-B experiments: are they disjoint?
• Violation of a Bell inequality in particle physics experimentally verified?
• Can experimental tests of Bell inequalities performed with pseudoscalar mesons be definitive?
• Can we falsify the consciousness-causes-collapse hypothesis in quantum mechanics?
• Is the EPR paradox really a paradox?
• What does an experimental test of quantum contextuality prove or disprove?
• The collapse problem as a consistency problem. Is the quantum measurement hypothesis consistent with conservation laws?
• The collapse of Bell determinism
• What is wave-function collapse by measurement?

Cited in

(4)

• Are collapse models testable via flavor oscillations?
• The effect of spontaneous collapses on neutrino oscillations
• Why do Bell experiments?
• Dynamical state reduction in an EPR experiment

This page was built for publication: How far do EPR-Bell experiments constrain physical collapse theories?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3431663)