Estimating the size of populations at high risk for HIV using respondent‐driven sampling data
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3465753
DOI10.1111/biom.12255zbMath1393.62066OpenAlexW1505174257WikidataQ35542313 ScholiaQ35542313MaRDI QIDQ3465753
Corinne M. Mar, Krista J. Gile, Mark S. Handcock
Publication date: 22 January 2016
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/48n4192z
social networkssuccessive samplingnetwork samplinghard-to-reach population samplingmodel-based survey sampling
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05)
Related Items (3)
Uncertainty estimation in heterogeneous capture–recapture count data ⋮ Modeling of networked populations when data is sampled or missing ⋮ Hidden Population Size Estimation From Respondent-Driven Sampling: A Network Approach
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Estimating hidden population size using respondent-driven sampling data
- Population size estimation based upon ratios of recapture probabilities
- Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation
- Modeling social networks from sampled data
- Inference in successive sampling discovery models
- Nonparametric inference under biased sampling from a finite population
- Connected components in random graphs with given expected degree sequences
- Some Estimators in Sampling with Varying Probabilities without Replacement
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation under a Successive Sampling Discovery Model
- Estimation of Finite Population Properties When Sampling is Without Replacement and Proportional to Magnitude
- A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence
- Improved Inference for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data With Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation
- A Useful Distribution for Fitting Discrete Data: Revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson Distribution
This page was built for publication: Estimating the size of populations at high risk for HIV using respondent‐driven sampling data