DO SUBLEADING CORRECTIONS TO BEKENSTEIN–HAWKING ENTROPY HOLD THE KEY TO QUANTUM GRAVITY?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3528533

DOI10.1142/S021773230802731XzbMATH Open1145.83338arXiv0805.4531MaRDI QIDQ3528533FDOQ3528533


Authors: S. Shankaranarayanan Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 October 2008

Published in: Modern Physics Letters A (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Black-holes are considered to be theoretical laboratories for testing models of quantum gravity. It is usually believed that any candidate for quantum gravity must explain the microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking (SmBH) entropy. In this letter, we argue (i) the requirement for a candidate approach to go beyond SmBH and provide generic subleading corrections, and (ii) the importance to {it disentangle} and identify the degrees of freedom leading to SmBH and its subleading corrections. Using the approach of entanglement of modes across the horizon, we show that the microscopic degrees of freedom that lead to SmBH and subleading corrections are different. We further show, using microcanonical and canonical ensemble approaches, that the quantum entanglement predicts generic power-law corrections to SmBH and that the corrections can be identified with the kinematical properties of the event-horizon.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.4531




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (10)





This page was built for publication: DO SUBLEADING CORRECTIONS TO BEKENSTEIN–HAWKING ENTROPY HOLD THE KEY TO QUANTUM GRAVITY?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3528533)