The Strength of Some Combinatorial Principles Related to Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3530396
Abstract: We study the reverse mathematics and computability-the-o-re-tic strength of (stable) Ramsey's Theorem for pairs and the related principles COH and DNR. We show that SRT implies DNR over RCA but COH does not, and answer a question of Mileti by showing that every computable stable -coloring of pairs has an incomplete infinite homogeneous set. We also give some extensions of the latter result, and relate it to potential approaches to showing that SRT does not imply RT.
Recommendations
Cited in
(28)- Some results concerning the \(\mathsf{SRT}_2^2\) vs. \(\mathsf{COH}\) problem
- Degrees bounding principles and universal instances in reverse mathematics
- The strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs over trees. I: Weak König's lemma
- Stable Ramsey's theorem and measure
- The definability strength of combinatorial principles
- Relationships between computability-theoretic properties of problems
- On notions of computability-theoretic reduction between Π21 principles
- The strength of the rainbow Ramsey Theorem
- The polarized Ramsey's theorem
- In search of the first-order part of Ramsey's theorem for pairs
- Computing sets from all infinite subsets
- Pigeons do not jump high
- An inside/outside Ramsey theorem and recursion theory
- Cone avoiding closed sets
- Partial orders and immunity in reverse mathematics
- Some Questions in Computable Mathematics
- On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs
- Strong reductions between combinatorial principles
- Ramsey-type graph coloring and diagonal non-computability
- The weakness of being cohesive, thin or free in reverse mathematics
- Nonstandard methods in Ramsey's theorem for pairs
- Dominating the Erdős-Moser theorem in reverse mathematics
- On the role of the collection principle for \(\Sigma ^0_2\)-formulas in second-order reverse mathematics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7377981 (Why is no real title available?)
- The thin set theorem for pairs implies DNR
- On the uniform computational content of Ramsey's theorem
- \( \mathsf{SRT}_2^2\) does not imply \(\mathsf{RT}_2^2\) in \(\omega \)-models
- Open questions about Ramsey-type statements in reverse mathematics
This page was built for publication: The Strength of Some Combinatorial Principles Related to Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3530396)