Pigeons do not jump high
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2313367
DOI10.1016/J.AIM.2019.06.026zbMATH Open1441.03013arXiv1803.09771OpenAlexW2963621191MaRDI QIDQ2313367FDOQ2313367
Authors: Benoit Monin, Ludovic Patey
Publication date: 19 July 2019
Published in: Advances in Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: The infinite pigeonhole principle for 2-partitions asserts the existence, for every set , of an infinite subset of or of its complement. In this paper, we develop a new notion of forcing enabling a fine analysis of the computability-theoretic features of the pigeonhole principle. We deduce various consequences, such as the existence, for every set , of an infinite subset of it or its complement of non-high degree. We also prove that every set has an infinite low solution and give a simpler proof of Liu's theorem that every set has an infinite subset in it or its complement of non-PA degree.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09771
Recommendations
- The weakness of the pigeonhole principle under hyperarithmetical reductions
- Slicing the truth. On the computable and reverse mathematics of combinatorial principles
- \(\mathsf{RT}_{2}^{2}\) does not imply \(\mathsf{WKL}_{0}\)
- A packed Ramsey’s theorem and computability theory
- The Strength of Some Combinatorial Principles Related to Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs
- The thin set theorem for pairs implies DNR
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7377981
- Partial orders and immunity in reverse mathematics
- Partial orders and immunity in reverse mathematics
- The weakness of being cohesive, thin or free in reverse mathematics
Foundations of classical theories (including reverse mathematics) (03B30) Applications of computability and recursion theory (03D80) Second- and higher-order arithmetic and fragments (03F35)
Cites Work
- Subsystems of second order arithmetic
- Classes of Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees of Unsolvability
- ∏ 0 1 Classes and Degrees of Theories
- On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs
- \(\mathsf{RT}_{2}^{2}\) does not imply \(\mathsf{WKL}_{0}\)
- The metamathematics of Stable Ramsey’s Theorem for Pairs
- A cohesive set which is not high
- Ramsey's theorem and recursion theory
- On the strength of Ramsey's theorem
- Rainbow Ramsey theorem for triples is strictly weaker than the arithmetical comprehension axiom
- The strength of the rainbow Ramsey Theorem
- Cohesive sets and rainbows
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A \(\Delta_2^0\) set with no infinite low subset in either it or its complement
- On the role of the collection principle for \(\Sigma ^0_2\)-formulas in second-order reverse mathematics
- Generics for computable Mathias forcing
- Some logically weak Ramseyan theorems
- The definability strength of combinatorial principles
- Partition Theorems and Computability Theory
- The Strength of Some Combinatorial Principles Related to Ramsey's Theorem for Pairs
- Reverse mathematics and a Ramsey-type König's lemma
- The thin set theorem for pairs implies DNR
- Ramsey's theorem and cone avoidance
- The weakness of being cohesive, thin or free in reverse mathematics
- The polarized Ramsey's theorem
- Cone avoiding closed sets
- Combinatorial principles between \(\text{RRT}_2^2\) and \(\text{RT}_2^2\)
- Iterative forcing and hyperimmunity in reverse mathematics
- Open questions about Ramsey-type statements in reverse mathematics
Cited In (6)
- Computing sets from all infinite subsets
- Isols and the pigeonhole principle
- The weakness of the pigeonhole principle under hyperarithmetical reductions
- \( \mathsf{SRT}_2^2\) does not imply \(\mathsf{RT}_2^2\) in \(\omega \)-models
- Ramsey-like theorems and moduli of computation
- The strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs over trees. I: Weak König's lemma
This page was built for publication: Pigeons do not jump high
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2313367)