Rainbow Ramsey theorem for triples is strictly weaker than the arithmetical comprehension axiom
DOI10.2178/JSL.7803070zbMATH Open1300.03013arXiv1303.3327OpenAlexW2592247263WikidataQ114005164 ScholiaQ114005164MaRDI QIDQ2869903FDOQ2869903
Authors: Wei Wang
Publication date: 7 January 2014
Published in: The Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3327
Recommendations
- The strength of the rainbow Ramsey Theorem
- A rainbow Ramsey analogue of Rado's theorem
- Some logically weak Ramseyan theorems
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 512985
- Some remarks on uncountable rainbow Ramsey theory
- More on monochromatic-rainbow Ramsey type theorems
- Random reals, the rainbow Ramsey theorem, and arithmetic conservation
- scientific article
- Rainbow Arithmetic Progressions and Anti-Ramsey Results
- Combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's Theorem for pairs
Foundations of classical theories (including reverse mathematics) (03B30) Applications of computability and recursion theory (03D80) Second- and higher-order arithmetic and fragments (03F35)
Cites Work
Cited In (8)
- Pathwise-randomness and models of second-order arithmetic
- Some logically weak Ramseyan theorems
- On uniform relationships between combinatorial problems
- Combinatorial principles between \(\text{RRT}_2^2\) and \(\text{RT}_2^2\)
- The weakness of the pigeonhole principle under hyperarithmetical reductions
- The strength of the rainbow Ramsey Theorem
- Pigeons do not jump high
- Cohesive sets and rainbows
This page was built for publication: Rainbow Ramsey theorem for triples is strictly weaker than the arithmetical comprehension axiom
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2869903)