Rainbow Ramsey theorem for triples is strictly weaker than the arithmetical comprehension axiom
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2869903
Abstract: We prove that where is the Rainbow Ramsey Theorem for 2-bounded colorings of triples. This reverse mathematical result is based on a cone avoidance theorem, that every 2-bounded coloring of pairs admits a cone-avoiding infinite rainbow, regardless of the complexity of the given coloring. We also apply the proof of the cone avoidance theorem to the question whether and obtain some partial answer.
Recommendations
- The strength of the rainbow Ramsey Theorem
- A rainbow Ramsey analogue of Rado's theorem
- Some logically weak Ramseyan theorems
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 512985
- Some remarks on uncountable rainbow Ramsey theory
- More on monochromatic-rainbow Ramsey type theorems
- Random reals, the rainbow Ramsey theorem, and arithmetic conservation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5014483
- Rainbow Arithmetic Progressions and Anti-Ramsey Results
- Combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's Theorem for pairs
Cites work
Cited in
(8)- Some logically weak Ramseyan theorems
- Combinatorial principles between \(\text{RRT}_2^2\) and \(\text{RT}_2^2\)
- The strength of the rainbow Ramsey Theorem
- Pathwise-randomness and models of second-order arithmetic
- Pigeons do not jump high
- Cohesive sets and rainbows
- The weakness of the pigeonhole principle under hyperarithmetical reductions
- On uniform relationships between combinatorial problems
This page was built for publication: Rainbow Ramsey theorem for triples is strictly weaker than the arithmetical comprehension axiom
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2869903)