Back to the St. Petersburg Paradox?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3530954
Recommendations
- Alternation Bias and the Parameterization of Cumulative Prospect Theory
- Solving the St. Petersburg paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting
- Cumulative prospect theory and the St. Petersburg paradox
- A resolution of St. Petersburg paradox
- A further examination of cumulative prospect theory parameterizations
Cited in
(18)- An approach to resolving two paradoxes in probability theory
- A resolution of St. Petersburg paradox
- Risk preferences of Australian academics: where retirement funds are invested tells the story
- Focus theory of choice and its application to resolving the St. Petersburg, Allais, and Ellsberg paradoxes and other anomalies
- The bipolar Choquet integral representation
- Preferences over all random variables: incompatibility of convexity and continuity
- An analysis of the generalized TODIM method
- Probability weighting and L-moments
- A monotone model of intertemporal choice
- Solving the St. Petersburg paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting
- Quantum-like model of subjective expected utility
- Cumulative prospect theory and the St. Petersburg paradox
- Axiomatizing bounded rationality: the priority heuristic
- A further examination of cumulative prospect theory parameterizations
- One-reason decision-making: modeling violations of expected utility theory
- What impacts the impact of rare events
- Behavior in the centipede game: a decision-theoretical perspective
- Alternation Bias and the Parameterization of Cumulative Prospect Theory
This page was built for publication: Back to the St. Petersburg Paradox?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3530954)
