A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_24zbMath1178.68566OpenAlexW1482673721MaRDI QIDQ3532473

Francesca Toni, Paul-Amaury Matt

Publication date: 27 October 2008

Published in: Logics in Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_24

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of game theory (91A80) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Related Items (18)

Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation using confirmation theory ⋮ Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs ⋮ Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation ⋮ Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter ⋮ Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules ⋮ An empirical and axiomatic comparison of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation ⋮ Syntactic reasoning with conditional probabilities in deductive argumentation ⋮ Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games ⋮ On restricting the impact of self-attacking arguments in gradual semantics ⋮ On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation ⋮ From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum ⋮ Uses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert arguments ⋮ Reasoning on the Web with Assumption-Based Argumentation ⋮ Using argument strength for building dialectical bonsai ⋮ Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results ⋮ Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics ⋮ Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles ⋮ On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation

This page was built for publication: A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation