Finding a heaviest vertex-weighted triangle is not harder than matrix multiplication
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3558009
Recommendations
- Finding a heaviest triangle is not harder than matrix multiplication
- Finding heaviest H-subgraphs in real weighted graphs, with applications
- Finding a maximum weight triangle in n 3-Δ time, with applications
- Finding the Smallest H-Subgraph in Real Weighted Graphs and Related Problems
- Finding the largest triangle in a graph in expected quadratic time
Cited in
(16)- Fooling views: a new lower bound technique for distributed computations under congestion
- Efficient parameterized algorithms for computing all-pairs shortest paths
- Detecting and counting small pattern graphs
- Finding the Smallest H-Subgraph in Real Weighted Graphs and Related Problems
- Even faster elastic-degenerate string matching via fast matrix multiplication
- Extreme witnesses and their applications
- Elastic-Degenerate String Matching via Fast Matrix Multiplication
- The NFA acceptance hypothesis: non-combinatorial and dynamic lower bounds
- Finding the largest triangle in a graph in expected quadratic time
- Extreme witnesses and their applications
- Finding heaviest H-subgraphs in real weighted graphs, with applications
- BetweenO(nm) andO(nalpha)
- Fredman's trick meets dominance product: fine-grained complexity of unweighted APSP, 3SUM counting, and more
- Finding a maximum weight triangle in n 3-Δ time, with applications
- On minimum witnesses for Boolean matrix multiplication
- Finding a heaviest triangle is not harder than matrix multiplication
This page was built for publication: Finding a heaviest vertex-weighted triangle is not harder than matrix multiplication
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3558009)