Predictor‐corrector procedures for pseudo‐dynamic tests

DOI10.1108/02644400510619530zbMath1191.70003MaRDI QIDQ3576553

A. Bonelli, O. S. Bursi

Publication date: 30 July 2010

Published in: Engineering Computations (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400510619530

zbMATH Keywords

structures; numerical analysis; programming and algorithm theory; tests and testing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

74H45: Vibrations in dynamical problems in solid mechanics

70-08: Computational methods for problems pertaining to mechanics of particles and systems

74H15: Numerical approximation of solutions of dynamical problems in solid mechanics

70K99: Nonlinear dynamics in mechanics

Cites Work

• Implicit-explicit finite elements in nonlinear transient analysis
• The discrete energy-momentum method. Conserving algorithms for nonlinear elastodynamics
• Explicit time integration algorithms for structural dynamics with optimal numerical dissipation
• The analysis of the generalized-\(\alpha\) method for nonlinear dynamic problems
• Frequency‐domain analysis of time‐integration methods for semidiscrete finite element equations—part II: Hyperbolic and parabolic–hyperbolic problems
• Enhanced integral form of the Newmark time stepping scheme for pseudodynamic testing
• EXPLICIT PREDICTOR–MULTICORRECTOR TIME DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS FOR LINEAR DYNAMICS
• EXPLICIT PREDICTOR–MULTICORRECTOR TIME DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS FOR NON-LINEAR DYNAMICS
• A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method
• An alpha modification of Newmark's method
• Explicit/implicit partitioning and a new explicit form of the generalized alpha method
• Robustness of the minimal control synthesis algorithm to non-linear plant with regard to the position control of manipulators
• Numerical integration of non‐linear elastic multi‐body systems
• Alternative characterization of time integration schemes