Some consequences of reflection on the approachability ideal

DOI10.1090/S0002-9947-10-04976-7zbMath1200.03029arXiv0804.0775MaRDI QIDQ3581136

Matteo Viale, Assaf Sharon

Publication date: 16 August 2010

Published in: Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0775

zbMATH Keywords

large cardinalssingular cardinal combinatorics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Large cardinals (03E55) Other set-theoretic hypotheses and axioms (03E65) Ordered sets and their cofinalities; pcf theory (03E04)

Related Items (13)

Forcing axioms and the Galvin number ⋮ Covering properties and square principles ⋮ Squares and covering matrices ⋮ Covering versus partitioning with Polish spaces ⋮ Partitioning a reflecting stationary set ⋮ Noetherian type in topological products ⋮ Singularizing cardinals ⋮ Magidor-Malitz reflection ⋮ Non-reflection of the bad set for \(\check{I}_\theta[\lambda\) and pcf] ⋮ A relative of the approachability ideal, diamond and non-saturation ⋮ Pseudo-Prikry sequences ⋮ A cofinality-preserving small forcing may introduce a special Aronszajn tree ⋮ The independence of \(\mathsf{GCH}\) and a combinatorial principle related to Banach-Mazur games

Cites Work

• Chang's conjecture for \(\aleph_\omega\)
• A family of covering properties
• Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I
• Exact upper bounds and their uses in set theory
• Walks on ordinals and their characteristics
• Coherent sequences and threads
• Ideals and Generic Elementary Embeddings
• Cardinal Arithmetic
• Successors of Singular Cardinals
• A very weak square principle
• Collapsing successors of singulars
• Reflecting stationary sets
• Set Theory
• On SCH and the approachability property
• The proper forcing axiom and the singular cardinal hypothesis

This page was built for publication: Some consequences of reflection on the approachability ideal