Partitioning a reflecting stationary set

DOI10.1090/PROC/14783zbMATH Open1484.03085arXiv1907.08581OpenAlexW3022087173MaRDI QIDQ5113417FDOQ5113417

Assaf Rinot, Maxwell Levine

Publication date: 11 June 2020

Published in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We address the question of whether a reflecting stationary set may be partitioned into two or more reflecting stationary subsets, providing various affirmative answers in ZFC. As an application to singular cardinals combinatorics, we infer that it is never the case that there exists a singular cardinal all of whose scales are very good.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08581

Recommendations

• Bounded stationary reflection
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1795296
• Nonreflecting stationary sets in \(\mathcal P_{\kappa}\lambda\)
• Reflection implies the SCH
• Nonsplitting subset of _κ(κ⁺)

zbMATH Keywords

Ulam matrixclub guessingvery good scalereflecting stationary set

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Consistency and independence results (03E35) Ordered sets and their cofinalities; pcf theory (03E04)

Cites Work

• Chain conditions of products, and weakly compact cardinals
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On SCH and the approachability property
• Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals
• Successors of Singular Cardinals
• On the arithmetic of density
• Reflecting stationary sets
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Diagonal Prikry extensions
• Some consequences of reflection on the approachability ideal
• Advances in Cardinal Arithmetic
• Splitting stationary sets from weak forms of Choice
• A consistency result on weak reflection
• Distributive Aronszajn trees

Cited In (6)

• Was Ulam right? I: basic theory and subnormal ideals
• Full Souslin trees at small cardinals
• Knaster and friends II: The C-sequence number
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Partitioning subsets of stable models
• Was Ulam right? II: Small width and general ideals

This page was built for publication: Partitioning a reflecting stationary set

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5113417)