A comparison between two solution techniques to solve the equations of glacially induced deformation of an elastic Earth

DOI10.1002/nme.2268zbMath1195.74110OpenAlexW2139417171MaRDI QIDQ3590378

Erik Bängtsson, Björn Lund

Publication date: 17 September 2010

Published in: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2268

zbMATH Keywords

FEMsaddle point matricesABAQUSdirect vs iterative solution methodsglacial rebound

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Glaciology (86A40) Geophysical solid mechanics (74L05) Geological problems (86A60)

Related Items

A general approach to analyse preconditioners for two-by-two block matrices ⋮ On element-by-element Schur complement approximations ⋮ Finite-element based sparse approximate inverses for block-factorized preconditioners ⋮ Macro-elementwise preconditioning methods ⋮ Spectral analysis of coupled PDEs and of their Schur complements via generalized locally Toeplitz sequences in 2D

Uses Software

• deal.ii
• PETSc
• ABAQUS

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Numerical simulations of glacial rebound using preconditioned iterative solution methods.
• A discourse on the stability conditions for mixed finite element formulations
• On iterative solvers in structural mechanics; separate displacement orderings and mixed variable methods
• Numerical solution of saddle point problems