Bargaining over productivity and wages when technical change is induced: implications for growth, distribution, and employment
From MaRDI portal
Publication:365756
DOI10.1007/s00712-012-0287-3zbMath1273.91227OpenAlexW2079087864MaRDI QIDQ365756
Publication date: 9 September 2013
Published in: Journal of Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-012-0287-3
Lua error in Module:PublicationMSCList at line 37: attempt to index local 'msc_result' (a nil value).
Related Items (2)
Endogenous capital-augmenting R\&D, intersectoral labor reallocation, and the movement of the labor share ⋮ A non-linear Keynesian Goodwin-type endogenous model of the cycle: Bayesian evidence for the USA
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A Kolmogoroff generalized predator-prey model of Goodwin's growth cycle
- THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL SHORTCOMINGS OF THE KALECKIAN INVESTMENT FUNCTION
- The Bargaining Problem
- Some stability properties of Goodwin's growth cycle a critical elaboration
- DISTRIBUTIVE AND DEMAND CYCLES IN THE US ECONOMY?A STRUCTURALIST GOODWIN MODEL
- THE WAGE-WAGE- . . . -WAGE-PROFIT RELATION IN A MULTISECTOR BARGAINING ECONOMY
- Front Matter
- Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model
- STEADY-STATE GROWTH AND DISTRIBUTION WITH AN ENDOGENOUS DIRECTION OF TECHNICAL CHANGE
- Induced Factor Augmenting Technical Progress from a Microeconomic Viewpoint
This page was built for publication: Bargaining over productivity and wages when technical change is induced: implications for growth, distribution, and employment