Properties which do not pass to classical rings of quotients.
2-primal ringsAbelian ringsclassical rings of quotientsDedekind-finite ringsOre ringssemicommutative rings
Associative rings determined by universal properties (free algebras, coproducts, adjunction of inverses, etc.) (16S10) Associative rings of fractions and localizations (16S85) Ore rings, multiplicative sets, Ore localization (16U20) Generalizations of commutativity (associative rings and algebras) (16U80)
The authors consider the problem of which properties of an Ore ring \(R\) pass or not pass to its classical ring of quotients. They show, by constructing counter-examples, that the answer is negative for many natural ring properties. In particular, they prove that the following properties do not pass to the classical ring of quotients: Abelian, Dedekind finite, semicommutative, \(2\)-primal, and NI. Some important construction techniques are also introduced. The paper closes by listing some interesting open questions on the subject.
- Morita equivalence and quotient rings
- Classical rings of quotients of semiprime PI-rings
- A commutative semiprime ring whose classical and complete rings of quotients are distinct
- Injective classical quotient rings of polynomial rings are quasi- Frobenius
- The ore condition for polynomial and power series rings
- A commutative semiprime ring whose classical and complete rings of quotients are distinct
- On classical rings of quotients of duo rings.
- The ore condition for polynomial and power series rings
- Unified extensions of strongly reversible rings and links with other classic ring theoretic properties
- Morita equivalence and quotient rings
- On rings with nonzero annihilators of ideals generated by finitely many zero-divisors
This page was built for publication: Properties which do not pass to classical rings of quotients.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q376029)
