Is AB = I, BA = I not equivalent to AB = BA = I?

DOI10.1080/0020739920230216MaRDI QIDQ4008032zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors B. Shreekantha Upadhyaya

Publication date 27 September 1992

Published in International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739920230216

zbMATH Keywords

left inverse

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Theory of matrix inversion and generalized inverses (15A09)

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3140521 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3824228 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3741472 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3778411 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 46700 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3641577 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3273551 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3381577 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3107995 (Why is no real title available?)
• Number theory in science and communication. With applications in cryptography, physics, biology, digital information, and computing
• On general properties of cubic systems
• Solutions for Diophantine equations with the method of cyclic matrices
• The inversion of the tractrix

Cited in

(1)

• Interior normal lengths on convex configurations

This page was built for publication: Is AB = I, BA = I not equivalent to AB = BA = I?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4008032)