Scrawny Cantor Sets are not Definable by Tori

DOI10.2307/2159234zbMATH Open0762.57006OpenAlexW4245705799MaRDI QIDQ4013499FDOQ4013499

Amy Babich

Publication date: 27 September 1992

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2159234

zbMATH Keywords

defining sequencewild Cantor sets

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Wild embeddings (57M30)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Tame Cantor sets in \(E^ 3\)
• Generalization of a construction of Antoine
• On Properly Embedding Planes in Arbitrary 3-Manifolds
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (6)

• Simply connected 3-manifolds with a dense set of ends of specified genus
• Genus of a Cantor set
• Inequivalent Cantor sets in \(R^{3}\) whose complements have the same fundamental group
• On defining sequences for Cantor sets
• Genus 2 Cantor sets
• Rigid cantor sets in $R^3$ with simply connected complement

   Recommendations

• Cantor sets in \(S^ 3\) with simply connected complements 👍 👎
• On defining sequences for Cantor sets 👍 👎
• Rigid cantor sets in $R^3$ with simply connected complement 👍 👎
• Sticky Cantor sets in ℝd 👍 👎
• Bing-Whitehead Cantor sets 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Scrawny Cantor Sets are not Definable by Tori

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4013499)