Excluding pairs of graphs

From MaRDI portal
Publication:402589

DOI10.1016/J.JCTB.2014.01.001zbMATH Open1297.05156arXiv1302.0812OpenAlexW2098242693MaRDI QIDQ402589FDOQ402589


Authors: Maria Chudnovsky, Alex Scott, Paul Seymour Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 28 August 2014

Published in: Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: For a graph G and a set of graphs mathcalH, we say that G is {em mathcalH-free} if no induced subgraph of G is isomorphic to a member of mathcalH. Given an integer P>0, a graph G, and a set of graphs mathcalF, we say that G {em admits an (mathcalF,P)-partition} if the vertex set of G can be partitioned into P subsets X1,...,XP, so that for every iin1,...,P, either |Xi|=1, or the subgraph of G induced by Xi is F-free for some FinmathcalF. Our first result is the following. For every pair (H,J) of graphs such that H is the disjoint union of two graphs H1 and H2, and the complement Jc of J is the disjoint union of two graphs J1c and J2c, there exists an integer P>0 such that every H,J-free graph has an (H1,H2,J1,J2,P)-partition. Using a similar idea we also give a short proof of one of the results of cite{heroes}. Our final result is a construction showing that if H,J are graphs each with at least one edge, then for every pair of integers r,k there exists a graph G such that every r-vertex induced subgraph of G is H,J-split, but G does not admits an (H,J,k)-partition.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.0812




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (7)





This page was built for publication: Excluding pairs of graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q402589)