When is homR(M,−) equal to homR(M,−) in the category R-gr?
DOI10.1080/00927879408825020zbMATH Open0802.16038OpenAlexW2068599250MaRDI QIDQ4295995FDOQ4295995
Authors: Gigel Militaru, José L. Gómez-Pardo, Constantin Năstăsescu
Publication date: 7 July 1994
Published in: Communications in Algebra (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00927879408825020
Recommendations
graded ringfinite topologyfinitely generatedGrothendieck categoriesgraded left \(R\)-modulesrelative small objects
Graded rings and modules (associative rings and algebras) (16W50) Finite transformation groups (57S17) Structure and classification for modules, bimodules and ideals (except as in 16Gxx), direct sum decomposition and cancellation in associative algebras) (16D70) Module categories in associative algebras (16D90)
Cites Work
Cited In (15)
- Some topics on homA(M, –) in the category of relative hopf modules
- Coarsening of Graded Local Cohomology
- When Products of Self-Small Modules are Self-Small
- Modules Commuting (Via Hom) with Some Colimits
- Compactness in abelian categories
- On quasi-duaiity modules
- Steady ideals and rings
- Autocompact objects of Ab5 categories
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Crossed modules and Doi-Hopf modules
- Grothendieck groups of complexes with null-homotopies
- When every self-small module is finitely generated.
- Connected objects in categories of S-acts
- Graded change of ring
- Small modules over Abelian regular rings.
This page was built for publication: When is homR(M,−) equal to homR(M,−) in the category R-gr?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4295995)