Optimal conditions for Bell-inequality violation in the presence of decoherence and errors
DOI10.1007/S11128-011-0242-1zbMATH Open1243.81042arXiv0804.4167OpenAlexW2120947765MaRDI QIDQ430101FDOQ430101
Authors: A. G. Kofman
Publication date: 20 June 2012
Published in: Quantum Information Processing (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.4167
Recommendations
General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15) Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations (81P40)
Cites Work
- Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
- Noise-induced finite-time disentanglement in two-atomic system
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions
- Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
- Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Quantum dynamical semigroups and applications. (Based on Lectures given at the 20th Symposium on Theoretical Chemistry held 1984 in Emmetten, Switzerland)
- Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-\(\frac 12\) states: necessary and sufficient condition
- Decoherence of a measure of entanglement
- Generic tripartite Bell nonlocality sudden death under local phase noise
- Local aspects of disentanglement induced by spontaneous emission
- Maximal violation of Bell inequalities for mixed states
- Entanglement and nonlocality versus spontaneous emission in two-atom systems
- Why two qubits are special
- Violation of a Bell-like inequality in single-neutron interferometer experiments: quantum contextuality
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: Optimal conditions for Bell-inequality violation in the presence of decoherence and errors
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q430101)